SEKo monitoring report Chemnitz 2018

Sanierte Altbauten am Brühl
TU Campus
Einfahrt Hauptbahnhof Chemnitz
Picture: Dirk Hanus | Picture: CWE / Foto: Agentur HORUS VISION | Picture: Dirk Hanus |

The SEKo Monitoring Report 2018 is an interim report for the observation period 2007 to 2016. It describes relevant framework conditions in Chemnitz and reviews the quality of target achievement for the objectives formulated in SEKo 2020.


On 24 October 2018, the Chemnitz City Council took note of the SEKo Monitoring Report 2018.

Occasion and goal

The SEKo Monitoring Report Chemnitz 2018 was compiled as an interim report for the period 2007 to 2016 on the basis of the stipulations in the SEKo 2020 of November 2009 and subsequent resolutions of the City Council.

The task and objective of the SEKo monitoring report is to review and evaluate the achievement of the goals of integrative urban development formulated in SEKo 2020 at a city-wide and sub-regional level.

download

Titel Monitoringbericht 2018
Picture: Stadt Chemnitz

Procedure and methodology

The SEKo monitoring report first describes the development of the demographic, economic and social framework conditions in Chemnitz over the last 10 years. The quality of the achievement of the objectives set out in the SEKo 2020 for many areas of urban life is examined by analysing the development of selected qualitative indicators. The "traffic light of target achievement" is used for a final brief assessment. The results are rounded off by trend-setting project examples from recent years from all residents' assembly areas in the city.

The report also identifies new topics, objectives and priorities for action with regard to future urban development. The basis for this is the evaluation of updated and new specialised concepts as well as the survey and participation of internal and external stakeholders and decision-makers.

The monitoring report serves as a building block for updating the SEKo 2020.

Structure of the report

Content parts

Part 1

Framework conditions for urban development


Part 1 describes the demographic and socio-demographic development in Chemnitz between 2007 and 2016, also in comparison with other large cities and differentiated by sub-area. The focus is on defined indicators and characteristics and the evaluation of the results.

Section 3 analyses the development of the financial framework conditions. The long-term financial performance of the city of Chemnitz is formulated as an overarching objective in the SEKo 2020. This is because it is an essential prerequisite for the realisation of almost all projects.

more

Part 2

Development in 4 monitoring areas


Part 2 analyses the quality of development in the four monitoring areas "Working" - "Living" - "Living" - "Environment and mobility".

The quality of target achievement is assessed by analysing selected indicators. The criteria for the selection of indicators are the guidelines and main objectives formulated in the 9 specialised concepts on which the FSPCO is based.

The "traffic light for target achievement" contains a brief explanatory assessment.

more


Part 3

The development in 8 defined sub-areas


Part 3 describes and compares the demographic and socio-demographic development in 8 urban sub-areas (area passes) on the basis of 10 selected indicators.

In the second section, 27 trend-setting individual projects from these 8 population centres are presented.

more

Part 4

Evaluation of the monitoring results


Part 4 summarises the results to date and identifies new objectives and priorities for action.

Section 1 describes fundamentally recognisable lines of development since 2007.

Section 2 contains four summarised "traffic lights of target achievement".

Section 3 reflects on new challenges for urban development in Chemnitz.

more

Key messages

  1. Important framework conditions have improved significantly since 2012:
    Population - Social conditions - Financial capacity.
  2. The goals set out in the SEKo have largely been achieved.
    There are many positive examples:
    Revitalisation of the city centre - Social housing provision.
  3. However, there are still unfinished projects:
    Magistralen in the entrance area - Increasing individual traffic.
  4. Urban development needs participation and an integrative approach.
  5. Increasingly complex developments require strategic content.